㰀䠀䔀䄀䐀㸀
㰀琀搀 眀椀搀琀栀㴀∀㔀─∀㸀
㰀℀ⴀⴀ㰀栀㈀㸀 㰀椀㸀匀攀琀ⴀ䄀猀椀搀攀 䄀氀攀爀琀㰀⼀椀㸀 渀攀眀猀 愀渀愀氀礀猀椀猀㨀 ⴀⴀ㸀 㰀栀㸀 䌀漀甀爀琀 猀愀礀猀 嘀䄀 刀甀氀攀 漀昀 吀眀漀 昀漀爀 瘀攀琀猀 漀瘀攀爀爀椀搀攀猀 挀漀渀琀爀愀挀琀椀渀最 眀椀琀栀 搀椀猀愀戀氀攀搀 㰀℀ⴀⴀ㰀栀㐀㸀 ⴀⴀ㸀
In the legal contest that pitted veterans against the disabled, veterans won, according to a recent decision by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.㰀⼀瀀㸀
The judge decided that Congress intended that the Veterans Affairs Dept. make a top priority of contracting with veterans and service-disabled veterans, overruling a previous law that favored contracting with nonprofits hiring blind and disabled people.㰀⼀瀀㸀
The court upheld the VA’s Rule of Two mandate under the Veterans Benefits Act of 2006. Under that law, the VA must perform a Rule of Two analysis on all procurements to determine if there are two or more veteran-owned, or service-disabled veteran-owned, small businesses that are likely to bid, and capable of doing the work at a fair and reasonable price offering best value to the government.㰀⼀瀀㸀
AbilityOne㰀⼀瀀㸀
The court said that at the VA, the Rule of Two for veterans and service-disabled veterans is a higher priority than the previous law requiring federal agencies to buy through the AbilityOne program.㰀⼀瀀㸀
AbilityOne is an independent agency that oversees nonprofits that hire and train workers with severe disabilities. Federal agencies are required to buy certain products and services from AbilityOne.㰀⼀瀀㸀
The federal claims decision made it clear that at the VA, the Rule of Two requirements overrule the regulations requiring AbilityOne.㰀⼀瀀㸀
“The court concluded that the VBA requires the VA to perform the Rule of Two analysis for all new procurements, whether the product or service is covered by the AbilityOne Program or not,” according to an analysis of the decision by PilieroMazza PLLC law firm.㰀⼀瀀㸀
The judges said the VA cannot contract with AbilityOne, unless it has determined that there are not two or more veteran-owned small businesses capable and willing to do the work at a fair and reasonable price offering best value.㰀⼀瀀㸀
Kingdomware㰀⼀瀀㸀
The decision also cited the Supreme Court’s Kingdomware decision last year, in which the justices determined that Congress intended that all procurements at the VA be subjected to the Rule of Two. If two eligible veteran-owned firms were identified and submitted bids, then the contract must be awarded to one of them.㰀⼀瀀㸀
PDS vs. AbilityOne & IFB㰀⼀瀀㸀
The bid protest lawsuit was filed by PDS Consultants Inc. (PDS v. United States, Case No. 16-1063C - Fed. Cl. May 30, 2017), a veteran-owned eyewear firm that seeks VA contracts. PDS objected to the VA’s purchases of visual aid products from AbilityOne.㰀⼀瀀㸀
The defendants included not only AbilityOne but also IFB Solutions Inc. as an intervener. IFB executives told the Winston-Salem Journal that 52 jobs are at stake, including 45 filled by employees who are blind. IFB has provided eyeglasses to the VA since 2000.㰀⼀瀀㸀
Attorneys said that the defendants are considering an appeal.㰀⼀瀀
㰀戀㸀䴀漀爀攀 椀渀昀漀爀洀愀琀椀漀渀㨀㰀⼀戀㸀
PilieroMazza analysis: http://goo.gl/eVXkLJ
圀椀渀猀琀漀渀ⴀ匀愀氀攀洀 䨀漀甀爀渀愀氀㨀 㰀愀 栀爀攀昀㴀∀栀琀琀瀀㨀⼀⼀最漀漀⸀最氀⼀㜀圀堀刀砀夀∀㸀栀琀琀瀀㨀⼀⼀最漀漀⸀最氀⼀㜀圀堀刀砀夀㰀⼀愀㸀
㰀愀 栀爀攀昀㴀∀猀琀漀爀礀⸀栀琀洀∀㸀
Court says VA Rule of Two for vets overrides contracting with disabled 㰀⼀栀㐀㸀
㰀愀 栀爀攀昀㴀∀猀琀漀爀礀㈀⸀栀琀洀∀㸀
㰀愀 栀爀攀昀㴀∀猀琀漀爀礀㌀⸀栀琀洀∀㸀
㰀愀 栀爀攀昀㴀∀猀琀漀爀礀㐀⸀栀琀洀∀㸀
㰀愀 栀爀攀昀㴀∀猀琀漀爀礀㔀⸀栀琀洀∀㸀
㰀愀 栀爀攀昀㴀∀猀琀漀爀礀㘀⸀栀琀洀∀㸀
㰀栀㐀㸀㰀愀 栀爀攀昀㴀∀椀渀猀椀搀攀⸀栀琀洀∀㸀 圀愀猀栀椀渀最琀漀渀 䤀渀猀椀搀攀爀㨀 㰀⼀栀㐀㸀
㰀瀀㸀
㰀⼀琀爀㸀
㰀⼀瀀㸀䌀漀瀀礀爀椀最栀琀 ☀挀漀瀀礀㬀 ㈀ 㜀 䈀甀猀椀渀攀猀猀 刀攀猀攀愀爀挀栀 匀攀爀瘀椀挀攀猀 䤀渀挀⸀ ㌀ ⴀ㈀㈀㤀ⴀ㔀㔀㘀 䄀氀氀 爀椀最栀琀猀 爀攀猀攀爀瘀攀搀⸀
㰀瀀㸀